Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 14, 2022 at 9:49 comment added Mark Booth According to a 2017 paper @bmu, looking at an actual 2GW solar installation, the NASA-SSE (2002) prediction was within 4.74% of the recorded value, whereas PVGIS-CMSAF (2007) was within 4.26%, so very little improvement. Now if any of the public tools had access to better datasets, this could go down to 2.66%, 1.10% or even 0.35%, but these don't appear to be an option with the tools you suggested in your answer.
Feb 14, 2013 at 10:21 comment added bmu -1 as I think the solar irradiance data seems to outdated. You should get better results when using something like PVGIS.
Feb 4, 2013 at 23:27 vote accept pizza247
Feb 14, 2013 at 14:53
Feb 4, 2013 at 18:23 review First posts
Feb 4, 2013 at 18:29
Feb 4, 2013 at 18:08 history answered Mark Booth CC BY-SA 3.0