Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 20, 2020 at 20:49 history bounty ended LShaver
Mar 18, 2020 at 14:14 history edited LShaver CC BY-SA 4.0
Added headings, made the calc more precise.
Mar 18, 2020 at 13:54 vote accept LShaver
Sep 27, 2019 at 15:45 comment added James Jenkins @LShaver the last last two paragraphs of the answer, imply that we have already burned about one hundred thousand earth-sized landmasses. Your thought that "Africa/Asia/some other recognizable land mass" is off be several orders of magnitude.
Sep 27, 2019 at 15:39 history edited Christopher Gilmour CC BY-SA 4.0
response to comments
Sep 27, 2019 at 15:09 comment added LShaver This is helpful, thanks. However, I'm more interested in how much coal we've burned -- not how much is in the ground. Of the 3 million generations of trees covering the land, how many became coal which we've already burned?
Sep 27, 2019 at 14:33 comment added Chris H It seems like if you could work out how many trees turned into coal, one further step would be to convert to the number of times you'd have to cover the earth's entire surface area with trees, then wait 20 years for them to grow
Sep 27, 2019 at 13:02 comment added Jean-Paul Calderone Nice. I wonder if there are any estimates of what proportion of the trees growing during that time actually made it into coal? Presumably some fell down and rotted, releasing some portion of their carbon immediately. Are we looking at 90% of the carbon in these trees turning into coal? 2%? I don't think this substantially changes the reasoning of your answer - unless the percent turns out to be vanishingly small, 10^-10% or some such. It would just be nice to have an estimate for completeness.
Sep 27, 2019 at 9:24 history answered Christopher Gilmour CC BY-SA 4.0