Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackSustain/status/1193000579133575169
added 63 characters in body
Source Link
LShaver
  • 12k
  • 6
  • 32
  • 83

My fridge is a Haier a3fe835cgjeHaier A3FE835CGJE and is rated A+++ (Europe, 2017), with about 200 litres volume, half of which for the freezer. It is a "no frost" model which does not require defrosting.

The reference energy consumption is 178 kWh/year, but in a week of October I measured the energy consumption and I obtained an estimate of 230 kWh/year.

The device is most of the time almost full, but that has likely a low impact. More important, we are two people so the amount of food getting in and out per week is likely less than what the manufacturer expects, given the size of the fridge, suitable surely for three or four people.

I keep 6°C and -18°C in the cooking and freezing compartments. There is a multipurpose intermediate compartment that I set to the warmest setting, +1°C.

The fridge is well spaced from the rear wall and the room temperature during the test was abou 20-21°C.

Is the measured discrepancy reasonable? Or should I complain?

My fridge is a Haier a3fe835cgje and is rated A+++ (Europe, 2017), with about 200 litres volume, half of which for the freezer.

The reference energy consumption is 178 kWh/year, but in a week of October I measured the energy consumption and I obtained an estimate of 230 kWh/year.

The device is most of the time almost full, but that has likely a low impact. More important, we are two people so the amount of food getting in and out per week is likely less than what the manufacturer expects, given the size of the fridge, suitable surely for three or four people.

I keep 6°C and -18°C in the cooking and freezing compartments. There is a multipurpose intermediate compartment that I set to the warmest setting, +1°C.

The fridge is well spaced from the rear wall and the room temperature during the test was abou 20-21°C.

Is the measured discrepancy reasonable? Or should I complain?

My fridge is a Haier A3FE835CGJE and is rated A+++ (Europe, 2017), with about 200 litres volume, half of which for the freezer. It is a "no frost" model which does not require defrosting.

The reference energy consumption is 178 kWh/year, but in a week of October I measured the energy consumption and I obtained an estimate of 230 kWh/year.

The device is most of the time almost full, but that has likely a low impact. More important, we are two people so the amount of food getting in and out per week is likely less than what the manufacturer expects, given the size of the fridge, suitable surely for three or four people.

I keep 6°C and -18°C in the cooking and freezing compartments. There is a multipurpose intermediate compartment that I set to the warmest setting, +1°C.

The fridge is well spaced from the rear wall and the room temperature during the test was abou 20-21°C.

Is the measured discrepancy reasonable? Or should I complain?

added 107 characters in body
Source Link
FarO
  • 429
  • 2
  • 8

My fridge is a Haier a3fe835cgje and is rated A+++ (Europe, 2017), with about 200 litres volume, half of which for the freezer.

The reference energy consumption is 178 kWh/year, but in a week of October I measured the energy consumption and I obtained an estimate of 230 kWh/year.

The device is most of the time almost full, but that has likely a low impact. More important, we are two people so the amount of food getting in and out per week is likely less than what the manufacturer expects, given the size of the fridge, suitable surely for three or four people.

I keep 6°C and -18°C in the cooking and freezing compartments. There is a multipurpose intermediate compartment that I set to the warmest setting, +1°C.

The fridge is well spaced from the rear wall and the room temperature during the test was abou 20-21°C.

Is the measured discrepancy reasonable? Or should I complain?

My fridge is a Haier a3fe835cgje and is rated A+++ (Europe, 2017), with about 200 litres volume, half of which for the freezer.

The reference energy consumption is 178 kWh/year, but in a week of October I measured the energy consumption and I obtained an estimate of 230 kWh/year.

The device is most of the time almost full, but that has likely a low impact. More important, we are two people so the amount of food getting in and out per week is likely less than what the manufacturer expects, given the size of the fridge, suitable surely for three or four people.

I keep 6°C and -18°C in the cooking and freezing compartments. There is a multipurpose intermediate compartment that I set to the warmest setting, +1°C.

Is the measured discrepancy reasonable? Or should I complain?

My fridge is a Haier a3fe835cgje and is rated A+++ (Europe, 2017), with about 200 litres volume, half of which for the freezer.

The reference energy consumption is 178 kWh/year, but in a week of October I measured the energy consumption and I obtained an estimate of 230 kWh/year.

The device is most of the time almost full, but that has likely a low impact. More important, we are two people so the amount of food getting in and out per week is likely less than what the manufacturer expects, given the size of the fridge, suitable surely for three or four people.

I keep 6°C and -18°C in the cooking and freezing compartments. There is a multipurpose intermediate compartment that I set to the warmest setting, +1°C.

The fridge is well spaced from the rear wall and the room temperature during the test was abou 20-21°C.

Is the measured discrepancy reasonable? Or should I complain?

added 100 characters in body
Source Link
FarO
  • 429
  • 2
  • 8

My fridge is from Haiera Haier a3fe835cgje and is rated A+++ (Europe, 2017), with about 200 litres volume, half of which for the freezer.

The reference energy consumption is 178 kWh/year, but in a week of October I measured the energy consumption and I obtained an estimate of 230 kWh/year.

The device is most of the time almost full, but that has likely a low impact. More important, we are two people so the amount of food getting in and out per week is likely less than what the manufacturer expects, given the size of the fridge, suitable surely for three or four people.

I keep 6°C and -18°C in the cooking and freezing compartments. There is a multipurpose intermediate compartment that I set to the warmest setting, +1°C.

Is the measured discrepancy reasonable? Or should I complain?

My fridge is from Haier and is rated A+++ (Europe, 2017), with about 200 litres volume, half of which for the freezer.

The reference energy consumption is 178 kWh/year, but in a week of October I measured the energy consumption and I obtained an estimate of 230 kWh/year.

The device is most of the time almost full, but that has likely a low impact. More important, we are two people so the amount of food getting in and out per week is likely less than what the manufacturer expects, given the size of the fridge, suitable surely for three or four people.

I keep 6°C and -18°C in the cooking and freezing compartments. There is a multipurpose intermediate compartment that I set to the warmest setting, +1°C.

Is the measured discrepancy reasonable? Or should I complain?

My fridge is a Haier a3fe835cgje and is rated A+++ (Europe, 2017), with about 200 litres volume, half of which for the freezer.

The reference energy consumption is 178 kWh/year, but in a week of October I measured the energy consumption and I obtained an estimate of 230 kWh/year.

The device is most of the time almost full, but that has likely a low impact. More important, we are two people so the amount of food getting in and out per week is likely less than what the manufacturer expects, given the size of the fridge, suitable surely for three or four people.

I keep 6°C and -18°C in the cooking and freezing compartments. There is a multipurpose intermediate compartment that I set to the warmest setting, +1°C.

Is the measured discrepancy reasonable? Or should I complain?

added 8 characters in body
Source Link
FarO
  • 429
  • 2
  • 8
Loading
added 156 characters in body
Source Link
FarO
  • 429
  • 2
  • 8
Loading
Source Link
FarO
  • 429
  • 2
  • 8
Loading