Is it the case that some of the energy expenditure associated with wastewater treatment is more proportional to the amount/type of waste than to the amount of treated water (meaning that my water has a lower marginal cost than a unit of water used for washing/flushing)?
When I say "energy expenditure," I'm also interested in embodied energy of treatment chemicals. I'm particularly interested in US cities.
If you want to include analysis of "fixed-cost" things like building the plant, precluded alternative land uses due to the plant, etc., feel free.