I purchased a Prius many years ago, but many of my friends have put forth claims that the batteries are very toxic and thus I may in fact be creating more harm than good in using a hybrid and that hybrid's are a less sustainable solution than non-hybrids?

How can one objectively measure the total footprint of a hybrid vehicle to determine whether the use of a hybrid over a traditional non-hybrid gasoline powered vehicle is lesser or greater? Has much research gone into the entire picture? For example, when the car reaches the end of its useful life, what happens to the batteries, can they be recycled or are they thrown away? What about the manufacture of the batteries, what negative effects come into play during manufacture? Are there other externalities that I've missed?

  • @Chad Should he rephrase the question as "Is driving hybrid cars (e.g. Prius) more sustainable than a conventional car?" to make in on topic? Surely environmentalism has a big overlap with sustainable living. – Earthliŋ Feb 11 '13 at 12:39
  • I've owned my Toyota Camry Hybrid since late 2007, and the only battery problem was one month ago, when my kid left an interior light on and it sat for 2 days and drained out. Haven't had a problem since the jumpstart. – JoshDM Mar 12 '13 at 23:25
  • @WilliamKF Great question. I think about this all the time. My gut tells me hybrids and electrics are more sustainable but not nearly as much as we think. Another variable in factoring the comparison would be the energy source that charges the car in the case of plug ins. Is it being charged by gas, nuclear, or coal plant? All have their draw backs. An electric car being charged by 1st world made solar panels would be the most sustainable in my opinion. – hortstu Jan 16 '14 at 17:42

So the short answer is to look at 'life-cycle assessment' studies (LCA).

The longer answer is to ask what you mean by 'better', and then look at a bunch of LCAs and figure out what impact categories you care about most.

In either case, the goal of LCA is to collect all the different inputs and outputs for a product for all stages - not just use, but manufacturing and mining and disposal, etc. These impacts are collected into a smaller number of interpretable impact categories. Some impact categories to think about: carbon footprint/global warming potential, energy consumption, ecotoxicity, human health, water consumption. All of these are pretty commonly used. There is a lot of research on LCA methods, both on how to collect the basic data and how to transform it into these impact categories. Two common methods include the EPA's TRACI or the european ReCiPe. Ideally, LCA's provide a quantitative and clear answer, but that's rarely true - they are quantitative though, which is really important.

For some of your later questions, particularly around batteries, the answers will depend on the study. The technical terms here are allocation and boundary conditions. Do we model battery recycling? who gets the benefits of it? what technologies are we looking at, and what other products do those produce? What impacts or processes do we include or exclude? There are generally a lot of assumptions, which need to be made and defended to move forward - though often they need to be revised for new technology.

To answer your initial question, there was a poorly done report from years ago that purported to show that older Priuses were 'worse' than a Hummer in terms of energy usage. The report was debunked all over the place, but it is true that we've gotten better at making batteries over time. New hybrids have much lower impacts than the originals, and keeping the car longer will definitely decrease the relative impact (one of the assumptions is about how long cars last). Check out a newer study here. In terms of toxicity, here's an older and newer study on the topic - it can take some study to get a reasonable answer, and it's rarely clear-cut. There are almost always tradeoffs.

  • 2
    On the other hand, a Dutch documentary claims that a vegetarian in a Hummer lives more sustainably than a meat-eater in a Prius (I'll put that one on Skeptics SE some day ;). – gerrit Feb 11 '13 at 16:46
  • @gerrit, I address this issue a bit in an answer about meat composting. Claims like this generally depend a lot on little details, but based on first-order effects, that statement may indeed be true. – Nate Apr 21 '13 at 22:27
  • @gettit Interesting, I'd imagine that if you had a vegan hummer driver (VHD) and a meat eating prius driver (MPD) and they both drove the same amount of miles, the VHD would be more sustainable until a certain amount of mileage was reached. – hortstu Jan 16 '14 at 17:48
  • @gettit The reason I say this is b/c producing meat and dairy animals releases methane gas into the atmosphere and methane is exponentially more potent green house gas than carbon monoxide. Therefore the drivers would have to put a great number of miles on their cars for the MPD to become more sustainable than the VHD. – hortstu Jan 16 '14 at 18:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.