2

There is a significant chance that this has been covered on SE, but I haven't yet found anything similar enough for my taste (see related questions, below).


Question:

How could I go about coming up with a good estimate of the average energy consumption (per unit volume) of residential US city water in

  1. A fairly water-abundant area
  2. A fairly water-scarce area,

assuming that I am in a low-rise building using cold water that I do not soften or filter, and that the water is going straight from my sink into the drain? I want to include the "downstream" costs of treatment, etc.


Background:

  • For specificity, you can imagine that I'm talking about Washington, D.C. or Los Angeles.
  • I'm interested in a range of interpretations of "energy," so feel free to include/exclude things like indirect effects on other water consumers, opportunity costs, embodied energy of water treatment chemicals, etc.
  • I am not so concerned about distinguishing between marginal and average cost; either one would satisfy me.
  • Related questions: here, here, here
  • My best guess so far: seems like a reasonable estimate excluding chemical production would be 3.6Wh/gallon, based on the municipal treatment and pumping cost from p4 of this study.
  • I have this unsourced number from a forum where the people seem really smart, here (reply #7), which is around 15Wh/gallon and seems to apply to both city and rural water in the UK.
  • This study from an open access journal for the entire US, says that "residential" "withdrawals" were around 29 billion gallons per day in 2005 and "residential" "direct" energy use for steam plus for heating, chilling, treating, pressurizing and pumping water was 4.47 quads in 2010, if I understand correctly. So if I assume steam=0, withdrawals=consumption, and 2005=2010, I get 4.47*[293 trillion]/(365*29 billion) Wh/gallon which is around 120Wh/gallon. I'm guessing maybe half to 75% of that is heating so I would get like 30Wh/gallon? Then maybe I should subtract a little bit because the steam use will be more energy-intensive on average?
  • 1
    Is there a practical point to this question? By that I mean, regardless of what the answer may or may not be (0.5x, x, 2x), what difference would it make? How could any answer to this question be used in a tangible and constructive way? – Tim Sep 26 '20 at 9:35
  • @Tim Good question! The answer could affect how much water I choose to use; in fact, I currently face a situation in my own life where I have to choose between using more water or more electricity. Also, the way that the answer is arrived at could affect my understanding of our water system, and that understanding could affect how I act as a "citizen," e.g. voting/advocacy/consumer choices/charitable giving. – capet Oct 10 '20 at 4:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.