Thermal mass is the amount of thermal energy needed to raise a building one degree. Sometimes it's desirable: earthships have very thick walls with a lot of material, while phase-change materials store latent heat; this phase-change allows a hot wax bottle to outlast hot water as a hand-warmer.

On the other hand, the thermal mass of solid concrete releases heat after sunset and prevents Pheonix and other hot-desert cities from getting overnight relief from the heat.

Heatwaves are the number one extreme weather killer of this warming world and can occur even in "cold" climates. Shelters without climate control still provide relief from the cold by keeping out rain, snow, and wind. But this same lack of airflow compounded with solar roof heating (designs with inadequate insulation) can make them very dangerous heat-wise.

Naively I would think adding thermal mass is a bad idea for weathering heatwaves. Doing so reduces the peak temperatures but also makes for hotter nights, which can be quite dangerous. Public spaces such as malls, office workplaces, stores, cafes provide relief and also require less cooled space per person. But these options are generally infeasible at night. Also, sleeping above 30C I find very unpleasant, much more so than walking at a dry 40C (if well hydrated!).

Of course, the significant discussion of adding thermal means my reasoning must be flawed. I see two possible use-cases. The first is to have so much mass that you can store heat seasonally and get relief all summer (and winter). But this point wouldn't the "house" resemble a cave? The other use case is if the house is ventilated a lot at night to "recharge" the mass and then sealed during the day. But wouldn't the energy costs of sustaining such a wind-tunnel be considerable?

Are my seasonal energy storage and nocturnal-ventilation examples common use-cases of thermal mass? Am I overlooking any other use-cases of thermal mass in human-occupied buildings?

  • A good question - I once lived in a cottage with thick stone walls, which was beautifully cool on hot summer days - but then I would bake as it released all that stored heat at night...
    – John M
    Aug 17, 2023 at 9:53

1 Answer 1


No system is ever perfect and when extreme situations occur, sometimes there aren't any good solutions.

Answering your questions in reverse order. Ventilating a house over night only works when the overnight temperature is very low compared to the daytime temperature and the duration of the low temperature is long enough to be useful. Hitting a short duration low is of now practical use. There needs to be time for the house to lose it heat and it does so in this situation by warming the air passing through it. The great the temperature difference between the hot house and the night air passing through it the better. It why refrigerative air conditioning systems work better when there is a large difference between inside and outside temperatures.

Concerning thermal mass, yes more is better. The more there is the longer it takes to warm up or cool down, given the season. In many ways thermal mass can also act as insulation.

A better concept is to have a thermal mass type of structure made of material that has low heat conductance. A house made of thick earth walls is better than one made of thick steel walls. Houses don't have to resemble caves, they can have windows, but either use double glazed windows or have a heat reflective film on the windows. Also, during the heat of the day protect windows from the sun by shielding them with a cover, something like shutters or awnings. Even season vine type of plants, or leafy trees, that shield the windows and the external walls during summer but have no leaves during winter would help.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.