When we installed our solar PV system in 2010 there were several reasons it wasn't feasible at that time to store and use the power we were generating instead of feeding into the grid.

The main reasons I can remember were:

  • Apparently some part of the system was noisy, not sure if was the inverter or that battery or what, but I was told that something hummed and may be a nuisance.

  • The cost was not worth it at that time.

  • The technology was not mature and solar batteries have a poor lifetime and often break.

Only 3 or 4 years ago there was hardly any reliable information available and not many people had systems installed so we just had to stick with what we were told was "the way to go".

I want to know if it is now a viable option to install a solar PV system and use the electricity rather than feeding it back to the grid or are there still good reasons not to do this?

  • 2
    can you clarify whether you mean environmentally, financially, or some other "viable"? Obviously it's technically viable, so I assume that's not your question. But do you mean "will I save money" or "will I reduce my environmental impact"?
    – Móż
    Jan 17, 2014 at 3:37
  • @Ӎσᶎ - To try and restate the points above in a different way: - Is the system noisy? - Is the cost of installing inverter etc. so expensive that is prohibitive (e.g. 10+ years to payback the system)? - Do the batteries work reliably, such that if I can generate all the electricity I need is there a product that works as it should with minimal oversight / maintenance?
    – going
    Jan 17, 2014 at 4:39
  • Inverter noise is very subjective, typically they have a fan which is similar to the ones found in computers, so if computer fans bother you so will the inverter. On the other hand, you can put the inverter in a location where the noise won't reach you (in the garage, for example).
    – Móż
    Jan 17, 2014 at 4:57
  • again, do you mean money cost or environmental cost? You seem to mean money cost?
    – Móż
    Jan 17, 2014 at 5:01

1 Answer 1


If your goal is to save money you'll need to do the calculations based on your exact location and costs. In Australia the main use of small battery-backed solar systems is for off-grid locations but people are increasingly looking at going off-grid as the cost of the grid keeps rising (mostly due to cheap air-conditioners) while the cost of PV systems drops.

If you're trying to reduce your total environmental impact the calculations become much more complex because you need to first decide what counts as "environmental impact" and how you're going to compare different sorts (see this question, for example), then for each option work out what the impact actually is. I'm going to assume you're just using money as your measure since the method is the same but the process is simpler.

To do the calculations you really must know not just how much electricity you use, but how much of that use can be eliminated, reduced, substituted or time-shifted. The value proposition for all of those changes when you're looking at off-grid power because of the cost of generating and storing it. You can get extremely efficient fridges, for example, but they're expensive. But off-grid the reduction in power consumption is often cheaper than generating the extra power using PV and storing it in batteries.

The sort of battery technology used for houses hasn't changed significantly in the last 20 years, it's still lead-acid based. There are a few lithium battery systems just starting to enter the market now, but if you are not happy with lead-acid batteries I would not suggest buying a lithium one until that market matures. It's still very "version one" right now.

The other way to save money and reduce your environmental impact is to reuse materials. If you're in an urban area you may be able to get "ready to recycle" lead-acid traction batteries, for example, that no longer work in their original application but are fine for you (an electric forklift that only runs for half a day is effectively useless, but a 50kWh rated battery that's down to 20kWh actual capacity is excellent value for $500). Similarly, buying second hand panels and supports might save you money and significantly reduce your environmental impact.

Since you're in Australia I suggest you join the Alternative Technology Association and read the relevant issues of their Renew magazine as this the viability of opting off the grid has been discussed recently. They've been talking about off-grid power system in Australia since they were founded (20-odd years IIRC).

  • For us, because we were able to leap on the Australian buy back scheme, we get paid by the government for power we generate (at a rate of 66c p/kwh) whether we use it or not. So, our 2.2kw system currently pays us (in credit and cash) roughly $450 per quarter. I'm not sure this will be as viable after 2017 when the contract ends but we'll see.
    – Christian
    Jan 22, 2014 at 23:41
  • @Christian those schemes have mostly gone now, and Queensland has even tried to make PV owners pay extra connection charges. You're very lucky to have got that deal.
    – Móż
    Jan 23, 2014 at 0:07
  • yeah we were super lucky. I think we would have done it eventually anyway, but just jumped on it when it came up. This country's approach to PV is medieval.
    – Christian
    Jan 24, 2014 at 1:02
  • Utility companies are starting to charge grid-tied solar homes here in the US, too. Their premise is folks are using the infrastructure and if they don't pay monthly fees to do so, then they are "parasites" on the system. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me since they are producing energy and feeding it back into the system, but... shrug
    – TeresaMcgH
    Jan 24, 2014 at 15:31
  • Those costs are exactly the thing that makes going off-grid more financially viable though, especially if they apply even to people not feeding the grid (and if not, talk about cutting off the power company's nose to spite it's face. At least in Oz home PV reduce the size of the peak and thus the size and cost of the grid).
    – Móż
    Jan 24, 2014 at 21:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.