We're considering a biomass boiler for our guesthouse (1820 vintage with corresponding energy issues). The opportunity to reduce gas usage and the economics of the RHI scheme in the UK (a sort-of feed-in tariff for logs) would seem to make this a no-brainer choice.

However, word-of-mouth comments question whether the source of wood pellets for the boiler is itself very sustainable.

Does anyone have any reliable references or pointers where I can learn more about this?

Edit: have found this one from Ethical Consumer. http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/buyersguides/energy/biomassboilers.aspx

PS. We have considered wood chip, and log, variants of biomass boilers which avoids the pellet manufacturing process and would offer better chances of a geographical local source. There are various logistical issues with these in our particular circumstances.

  • Am I right that the site you've edited in is a (partial) answer to your question? If so, perhaps you can post it as an answer? – THelper Nov 21 '14 at 8:03
  • @THelper Done. I'd hesitated doing so, hoping to get better answers but I can understand the reasoning for posting answers as answers. – Cheeseminer Nov 21 '14 at 19:05
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I guess the sustainability depends strongly on how the pellets are produced. Often pellets are made from by-product from other forest industry which makes it trickier to calculate emission and carbon footprint.

I took a quick look at IEA (International Energy Agency) and they had a general article about bio-energy: http://www.iea.org/techinitiatives/renewableenergy/bioenergy/

They also refer to a book about pellets "The Pellet Handbook", haven't bought or read it thou: http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9781844076314/

  • Good link, especially if you drill through the main site ieabioenergy.com and the links on the newsletters. That said, I'd be a touch suspicious that they are coming from a solely energy production perspective rather than a broader sustainability one. E.g. it could be that their numbers could be used to argue for chopping down rainforests or other important ecologies, but I'd not consider that 'sustainable' in a wider sense. Neither, probably, would they, but it's not a factor in their evaluations as far as I can see. – Cheeseminer Dec 17 '14 at 11:00
  • iea.org/techinitiatives/renewableenergy/bioenergy The content you are looking for does not exist, or has been moved. – Marian Paździoch Jan 27 '16 at 12:26

This is a partial self-answer. While I'm generally happy with EC's information some of the linked sites are not ones that strike me as 'reliable' sources of facts, so I am am still rather hoping more answers will follow.

From Ethical Consumer: http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/buyersguides/energy/biomassboilers.aspx

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.