Magnesium alloy wheels (aka mag wheels) are desirable to car enthusiasts due to an increase in performance, but with reduced weight there would also be a fuel saving.

Obviously prices and fuel efficiency varies for different cars and parts, but has anyone calculated whether the purchase cost could be justified through fuel savings in some cases?

  • 1
    Out of curiosity, how do alloys give a performance increase? I always assumed it was all about the looks :-) – Flyto Feb 26 '15 at 10:08
  • 2
    @SimonW magnesium is light. According to Wikipedia, "Lighter wheels can improve handling by reducing unsprung mass, allowing suspension to follow the terrain more closely and thus improve grip, however not all alloy wheels are lighter than their steel equivalents. Reduction in overall vehicle mass can also help to reduce fuel consumption." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alloy_wheel – Highly Irregular Feb 27 '15 at 2:04
  • The lower weight of "mag" ( normally aluminum) wheels only has any affect during acceleration ( or deceleration), so do not save fuel. They need less horse power during acceleration so are only an advantage during a drag race. There are two accelerations ; The rotational acceleration of the wheels and the linear acceleration of the vehicle. – blacksmith37 Oct 22 '18 at 0:52

A quick look doesn't show a clearcut weight difference. The claim is more for a 'rounder' wheel and a 'stiffer wheel'

First order approximation fuel economy depends on the weight of the vehicle, given the same engine. Suppose that your vehicle weighs 1 metric ton -- 1000 kg -- 2200 lbs.

Suppose that an alloy wheel was 5 kg lighter. That would be 20 kg (25 if you have a full size alloy spare) lighter.

20 kg is 1/50 of 1000, so 2% lighter vehicle.

So you get 2% better fuel economy.

So each $100 worth of wheel set cost requires the use of $5000 (2% of 5000 = $100) fuel to offset it's cost.

If a typical midsize car gets 30 mpg, and gas cost $3 per gallon, then your fuel cost is 10 cents per mile. $5000 worth of gas is 50,000 miles. If your car lasts 6 times as long -- 300,000 miles, then a 2% fuel savings would pay for an expenditure of $600 for a set of alloy wheels.

Given the costs I saw at Tiretown, this is a non starter. Prices were over that per wheel, let alone per set.

Note: A higher mileage car would take even longer to pay off. But even a 10 mpg muscle car would require 100,000 miles to get to this same point -- which still isn't enough.

  • 3
    You wouldn't get 2% better fuel economy by reducing weight by 2%. This presentation suggests that the savings would be closer to 1%, which makes the payback period worse. – Johnny Feb 16 '15 at 4:32
  • 1
    It's messy. On one hand, wind resistance is the major factor, and so wheel weight doesn't matter. On the other hand, energy to accelerate will be linear with mass. On the third hand, wheel weight is unsprung, and so the up and down motion also takes more energy. I was unable to find actual weight comparisons, so I treated as a Back of the envelope problem to demonstrate that it was non-feasible. – Sherwood Botsford Feb 17 '15 at 14:02


The calculation in the other answer is rather naive. I haven't done the calculation myself, but there are a few things to consider. First of all, lighter wheels mean more than just lower overall vehicle weight. Advantages are:

  • lower overall vehicle weight: lower inertia of the car
  • lower weight of the wheel (rotating part): lower rotational inertia
  • (probably) different aerodynamic behavior
  • lower unsprung weight

Weight distribution in the wheel also makes a huge difference. If the weight is more to the center, there's even less rotational inertia. Therefore, smaller diameter wheels are better than large diameter wheels! Clearly then, saving 10 kg in weight on wheels has a much higher impact on fuel economy than saving 10 kg by removing the backseat or something. A (itself quite naive) calculation suggests a factor of 1.5 difference, based purely on the rotational inertia.

You're especially going to notice the difference when accelerating and decelerating a lot (because that's when weight matters), so in city driving your savings will be higher than in constant high-speed highway driving (where drag matters).


A test was conducted on a racetrack with 3 different wheel configurations, documented here. They also did a road test to measure fuel economy, but the main goal was better lap times. Obviously, the lighter wheels yielded better lap times. Unfortunately though, the road test actually registered worse fuel economy for the lightweight wheels. There's a few things that explain this result, having to do with the fact that this test aimed to optimize the car for lap times, not fuel economy. Those are the wheel size (the lightweight wheel had a larger diameter) and different tires (the stock tires were optimized for low rolling resistance). The stock wheels were already light as well, 20.5 pounds, while the lightweight wheels weighed 17 pounds, so the difference wasn't that major. There may also have been a difference in driving style. I wonder what the results would be with identical wheel size, the same tires and controlled driving conditions.

However, it's still interesting to note that the differences in fuel economy were quite measurable, about 2%. It's hard to determine what that would mean for real-life driving situations, but I could imagine a set of carefully chosen wheels saving a few tens of bucks on a yearly basis. That'd still mean you'd have to drive the car for at least a couple of years to pay for the wheels (assuming you receive the same amount when selling the car), but the lifespan of most cars probably makes the investment worthwhile.

NB: I'm not thinking about an expensive set of wheels here, I bought a set of less than €300 for my wife's compact car, with the same diameter as the original set. They obviously aren't magnesium wheels though, those are way more expensive.

  • 1
    Thanks for the answer! There's some great logic there. I do question the logic "that the lighter wheels enabled the car to drive more in the high-RPM range"; I would expect the opposite to be true. Perhaps it was mainly the wheel diameter that made the difference to fuel economy. – Highly Irregular Sep 12 '15 at 11:01
  • 1
    Well, as this test was done on a track and the goal was lap times (not lower fuel consumption), the lighter wheels meant that the car could accelerate slightly faster and probably reach a higher top speed, therefore the engine would run more in the high-RPM range. – aross Sep 14 '15 at 7:53
  • 1
    Oh, I guess I skimmed the article too fast. They did the fuel economy test during road rides, not on the track. Still though, the setup was meant for performance, not fuel economy. I can imagine especially the tires making the difference on the road, as the stock tires were optimized for fuel economy. – aross Sep 14 '15 at 8:12

Wheel price is low

If you buy for fuel economy, then scuffed wheels from a scrapyard search service or classified ads are OK.

"$600 for a set of alloy wheels. Given the costs I saw at Tiretown ... prices were over that per wheel, let alone per set"

Ebay here in the UK has a good way of narrowing-down a quick search. I found one seller charging the same amount for old alloys as people charge for new plastic covers - fifteen UK pounds x 4 reduced from twenty-five x 4. I don't know how much I'd pay on a scrapyard search service or to someone with an add saying "breaking XXX vehicle close to you" but it would be the same kind of amount I suppose. Partshark, a scrapper search site, has one add for my type of car with a price of "please call" and courier fees to pay on top. Anyway it could be way-under the $600 per wheel break-even point quoted further up the thread.

If you enjoy economy or protecting the environment, you might not factor-in the time spent learning what wheels fit your car, buying wheels, and reselling if you get it wrong, but then there's the cost of changing the wheels for real with blown-up tyres on them. That's either an unfamiliar, time-consuming job with difficulties in wheel-balancing or a job you pay other people to do. There are web sites about cheap tyres that note the price of tyre fitting - often mobile tyre fitting - which is about the same per wheel as the wheels themselves. I guess that tyre fitters double the price if you want them to change a wheel as well.

Here's a suggestion. If anyone here runs a scrapyard parts ordering service, why not add a category for ugly scuffed alloy wheels for sale to misers?

Or if anyone runs a mobile tyre fittings service why not add an "scuffed old alloy wheels if available" option to the price list?

  • Thanks! There are some really neat ideas in your answer! – Highly Irregular Oct 23 '18 at 1:27
  • Sounds interesting. However even new wheels might work. I've done a lot of research recently for my new car, and it's hard to find wheel weights (they aren't advertised very often). However, with the few numbers that I was able to dig up, I still found wheels that were 3kg lighter, and they were standard cast aluminium alloys for cheap. – aross Sep 10 at 15:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.