Based on a previous discussion, it appears panels are being sold at less than 10% of their raw material cost. What is making up the difference?

Edit: The answer seems to be that... solar is viable as long as silicon is below about $50/kg. Which is odd considering panel prices were roughly the same in the late 2000s yet silicon was much higher.

Edit 2: Were getting contradictory statements on solar costs from energynumbers. Establishing a Small Commercial Solar Plant


Your first sentence is incorrect, as per the very chat discussion you've referenced: the sales price for panels is more than the cost of the panel's components.

The second sentence is also incorrect: solar is viable as long as people are willing to pay for it.

And so is your third sentence: panel prices have dropped a lot in the last six years.

Take all those away and all that's left is the title: "how does the solar industry fund itself?"

Remember that there is no single "solar industry". Silicon extractors and refiners sell to various markets: glass, electronics, PV.

Like pretty much any other supply chain, the PV supply chain funds itself through sales. And like a lot of other supply chains, in some countries it may also be partially funded by the State.

| improve this answer | |
  • Panel prices fell 60 percent since 2008 while silicon fell more than 20 times intermtnwindandsolar.com/… upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fa/… – D J Sims Apr 26 '16 at 16:00
  • So it wasnt until after the late 2000s that solar was profitable. – D J Sims Apr 26 '16 at 16:02
  • As for "solar is viable as long as people are willing to pay for it", nobody would pay for solar at 50 cents a watt. That would mean, if solar and similar renewables were to provide all energy- about 4tw in the US- it would cost more than all manufacturing production to sustain. – D J Sims Apr 26 '16 at 16:19
  • 2
    @Mustang if you'd like to open a new specific question about the cost of renewable systems, or how to calculate energy demand (US energy demand is ~1.2 TW), please do so. If you want to work through a sample calculation of costs of energy using real numbers, then please do just ask in chat. – 410 gone Apr 28 '16 at 4:09
  • 1
    @DJSims that wikipedia page gives US energy demand as 1.4 TW for 2012, so that's pretty close to the number I gave. Remember that primary energy consumption and energy demand are very different things. – 410 gone Jul 11 '16 at 6:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.