I would like to add solar to my energy mix. For context, my grid supply is unstable. Currently I have a UPS which switches to Batteries when grid goes down. I have been researching products which can prioritize use of energy in this order:

  1. Solar Panels
  2. Grid
  3. Batteries

Above priority means use solar first, if not sufficient add grid power. If grid is down, use augment solar with batteries. Same priority for charging batteries.

So is there a solution which satisfies above requirements ?

Note. Grid-tied setup is out of question. I want to be able to take power from the grid when solar output is low but do not want to give back to grid in case of excess power.

  • Where are you located? In India Su-Kam makes a great inverter for this purpose (link), not sure if they sell it in other countries. – LShaver Mar 3 '17 at 18:57
  • It seems from the link that power priority is Solar, batteries then grid. It is different from my use case. I want to cycle battery as last resort. – bhains Mar 3 '17 at 19:45
  • 1
    It is unclear on their site but I have used this product before on a project (though I am not affiliated with Su-Kam). When that battery is charged, loads will be powered by solar or grid, whichever is available. – LShaver Mar 3 '17 at 20:24
  • Where are you located? Standards and requirements will vary by country and state. – LShaver Jul 24 '17 at 18:31

(Take this whole answer with caution as I'm not a solar professional or electrical engineer.)

1. Proposal: House on UPS, fed by solar charger and current-controlled AC charger

This is an experimental proposal as I have not tried it yet. If it works, it would be nice though as it uses nearly exclusively off-the-shelf, standard products.

The idea is to always run the house from the UPS (means, don't connect the grid input to the UPS, so it will always "think" that the grid is down). Instead, AC electricity will be mixed in (when available and solar is not enough) with an AC based battery charger connected to the UPS's battery, in parallel to a solar charge controller connected to the same battery. The UPS now always runs "on battery", but the battery is fed from solar and grid at the same time. Thus, if the momentary power draw of the inverter is matched by the output of the two battery chargers, there is no cycling and thus no degrading of the battery involved.

For lead-acid batteries, two chargers connected in parallel can usually work together without interfering with each other. What you'll need to prioritize the input of the solar charger over that of the grid-based charger is a kind of current limiter in one wire of the connected AC-fed charger. It would only permit as much current as needed to maintain the float charging voltage of the lead-acid battery – which can be zero ampere if the solar panel output alone can cover the house's power draw. That current limiter is the only non-standard device. But since it deals with 12 V or 24 V DC electricity only, it is relatively safe to create it in a DIY manner, for example from a PWM controller for DC motors, a battery voltage sensor and an Arduino microcontroller. Using a PWM controller to pulse-charge the battery will not harm it as current and voltage of the pulses are kept within spec by the battery charger itself (see).


  • It might limit the maximum power available in the house, as it's now limited to the maximum power output of the UPS even when the grid is available.

  • There is a wasteful AC → DC → AC conversion involved. But if you have enough solar panels and low power needs overnight, that wastage is quite low as the house will mostly operate on solar.

  • When the AC-fed charger is not as powerful as the UPS, during peak loads some slight battery cycling can happen (example: UPS draws 2000 W for powertool usage, while the AC-fed charger provides a maximum of 750 W and there is no sun). That's probably no issue as peak loads are generally short and a lead-acid battery can cope with very shallow cycling for years (see: use as automotive batteries).

2. Alternative: UPS plus grid-connected inverter without feed-in

There is an alternative where you'd have a grid-tied setup but without feed-in and when the grid goes down, your UPS takes over as it usually does. The solar panels would feed into the grid-tied inverter and in parallel into the battery of the UPS (by connecting a battery charger to it). It avoids the wasteful AC → DC → AC conversion of the solution proposed above, however there are other issues so that I don't think this solution would work:


  • It can take a few minutes for grid-tied inverters to detect that the grid is down and to stop producing AC (so-called "anti-islanding feature"), and in that period the UPS could repeatedly switch back and forth as it "sees" some AC electricity on its grid side. It will depend on the inverter's switching behaviour.

  • You'd need both a grid-tied inverter and a UPS, which includes another inverter. And grid-tied inverters are much more expensive than those in a UPS.

  • 1
    proposal 1: It is almost certainly possible to set the solar charger to a slightly higher voltage than the mains one. That will cause it to deliver more power while it can. But a better solution is a proper change-over circuit. Those are more common than you might think, and there's one built into the UPS. – Code Abominator Nov 13 '18 at 0:17
  • Yes, an automatic transfer switch is a simple and workable solution. Only issue, it's "either-or", not "use solar first, if not sufficient add grid power" as requested by the OP. – tanius Nov 13 '18 at 0:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.