It's clear that firewood that hasn't been well dried is more polluting and less energy efficient, hence the existence of various schemes to ensure firewood suppliers provide dry wood.

Is there a way to measure the moisture content of my firewood without specialist equipment?


It can be possible using drying piece of sample wood,

Dry pieces of wood in the oven or in another way . Make sure that pieces should be well cut. Logs have varying moisture contents, depending on tree age, time since felling and position in the seasoning pile. The moisture content also varies from the middle of the log to the ends. You should use 3 to 5 pieces logs, of varying cross sections and Densities/”weights”. Cut each piece straight across the middle and split down the length. Discard everything except one small piece from each log.

weight 1=Take the pieces, weigh them on accurate kitchen scales and note the total weight 
Weight 2=Place in a low oven (less than 100 deg c) overnight. Weigh again and note the total weight.

The calculation for moisture content is as follows:

   Weight of Water=Weight 1 – Weight 2

     Moisture (%) = Weight of Water / Weight 1 x 100

Here is a worked example:

 Weight 1 = 1.7 Kg
 Weight 2 = 1.36 Kg

Therefore 1.7-1.36=0.34


As said elsewhere, you can experiment with moisture from 25% down to 19% and see what works best in your stove, fire or burner.

  • Great answer, thanks. Out of interest, are you aware of any reason why wood could be considered too dry? – Highly Irregular May 23 '13 at 8:29
  • 2
    I don't think wood could be considered too dry. It will burn faster and cleaner, but if you have good control of the airflow, you should be able to control at what rate it burns. Also, depending on the climate, the wood always has some moisture content anyway and any measures to keep it below humidity (like drying it in the oven) would certainly lower the overall sustainability factor. Also, very dry wood can ignite outside of the stove, when it is stored too close to the stove, but the preventative measure of choice would be a safer storage place, not greener wood. – Earthliŋ May 25 '13 at 5:23
  • 1
    The problem of having wood stored for too long isn't that it is "too dry" but that some of the burnable oils evaporate, leaving less energy in the log. – Johanness Feb 8 '14 at 21:08
  • @HighlyIrregular Just for the sake of argument. If you dry too well your wood then cram it it some container, the dry wood will absorb water, expand and destroy your valuable container. It also can happen that you want to limit the heat of your fire (to avoid some chemical to occur) and adding water inside is an efficient way to do so – Madlozoz Jun 23 '15 at 19:08

Here's an example of a device that measures the moisture of wood electrically, via resistance. While the electrical measurement will bequick, I'm sure that the procedure described by Yadav Chetan provides a far more representative result.

  • 1
    .... "without specialised equipment" - I read it to late. Oh well. – mart Aug 7 '13 at 9:14

I suggest the following:
1) Take a jug with a scale and fill it with water water. Measure the amount of water. That's the starting value.
2) Put a piece of wood inside the jug and let it swim. Measure at the scale the new volume. That value minus the starting value is the weight of the peace of wood.
3) Press the piece of wood under water an measure again the value at the scale. Thats the volume of the peace of wood.
4) Divide the weight and the volume to calculate the density. The density is directly connected to the content of moisture.
So let the water games begin :)

  • Thanks for the interesting answer! Unfortunately, even though I'm no expert in wood, I'm still about 99% sure that the assumption "The density is directly connected to the content of moisture." is incorrect. A few years back I had some firewood obtained from old hardwood power poles, and it was very clearly more dense than other wood; it was very dry, and for its size very very heavy, and boy did it burn well once it got going... – Highly Irregular Mar 5 '15 at 9:36
  • Hi Highly Irregular, as you can see in the link, their is a correlation of the content of moisture and the seasoned firewood.<(engineeringtoolbox.com/weigt-wood-d_821.html) But their is of course one exception for the method I (and heureka: Archimedes ;) ) supposed: the wood must have a less specific weight (lass that 1 kg/l) than water has, so that it can swim. – Noli-me Mar 7 '15 at 13:40
  • Looking at the data, I don't see any correlation that would be useful to the technique you're describing. – Highly Irregular Mar 10 '15 at 23:50
  • 2
    @Highly Irregular: Density is definitely connected to the tree species. Mountain mahogany, for instance, will sink even after it has dried for years. – jamesqf Jun 19 '15 at 5:41

Wood can be "too dry" . It loses waxes and esthers that contribute heat (energy)

We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

  • 5
    Can you point me to some more information about this? Thanks! – Highly Irregular Jan 28 '14 at 21:35
  • 5
    Hi Roger, and welcome to Stackexchange. This sounds interesting, but for it to be a good answer it'll need some more detail, and ideally a source for the information. If you want, you can edit your answer to include this using the "edit" option just below your text. – Flyto Jan 28 '14 at 22:55
  • I found some information about wood being too dry: woodheat.org/firewood-too-dry.html – THelper Mar 18 '16 at 10:05

take one sample of that firewood then burn it, a burning firewood which is moist will tend to produce a bubbles at the other end caused by the combination of the moisture content of wood and the gases it accumulated during the burning process .

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.