4

I've heard that the production and import of chocolate has some consequences including deforestation, excessive use of pesticides and CO2 emissions. There are also concerns about exploitation of workers. And that's all before even considering milk chocolate, where animal agriculture (especially dairy cows) is known to have its own environmental impact.

If I am going to be purchasing chocolate, how can I choose the most sustainable? Ideally I'm looking for advice on picking the best ingredient composition and understanding the relative value of different labels. My priorities (in order) are forest-effects (land use change), fair labour practices, and CO2 emissions.

  • This will be very hard to answer objectively and we also risk this post becoming a spam magnet for chocolate brands. Nevertheless I do like the question. I think answers should focus on the chocolate making processes that have the lowest environmental impact and/or highest social impact. – THelper Mar 6 at 9:01
-4

Nestle has a new 70% dark chocolate made entirely from the cocoa fruit:

https://www.nestle.com/media/news/nestle-first-chocolate-cocoa-fruit

This is not just a brand-naming but a new chocolate process.

And a trend of using most of the coca fruit has begun:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-05/wholefruit-chocolate-review-using-cacao-pulp-pod-not-just-beans .

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    I guess this could possibly have some sustainability angle if it incorporates what was previously a waste product to replace another input (eg cane sugar). But ... the press release says nothing about sustainability and presumably Nestle's goal is just to maximize profit, not protect rainforests, workers, or the climate. So ... is this really an answer? – Jean-Paul Calderone Mar 6 at 0:38
  • 1
    This answer could be better if it explained why being made from the cocoa fruit mattered, and how that process is different from the current standard process. – Nic Mar 6 at 5:58
  • 1
    This answer doesn't explain why this chocolate would be the most sustainable choice. Furthermore Nestle has a very bad reputation when it comes to (social) sustainability and greenwashing, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestlé#Controversy_and_criticisms – THelper Mar 6 at 8:55
  • 1
    Indeed, my comment doesn't provide proof. I was hoping that after my comment you would edit your answer and explain why you think this new development is the best. The basis for your answer seems to be the 2 links. StackExchange-wide policy is that answers should contain the most relevant information and only provide links for background information. Otherwise if a link breaks your answer will be worthless. – THelper Mar 6 at 12:28
  • 1
    Additionally, the links do not provide any evidence why Nestle would be better than say these guys for example who produce organic chocolate in the same location where the cocao is grown and transport their chocolate per sailboat. The articles you link to do not mention preservation of (rain)forests, being fair-trade, carbon footprint, etc. All 3 topics are of concern to the OP. – THelper Mar 6 at 12:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.